I
am coming to realize more and more how central school counselors are to meeting
the needs of students, and the extent to which it will be imperative for us to
be leaders in our school districts.
I connected with several strategies that the textbook discussed related
to counselors as leaders.
First,
I love the idea of a TAP program.
It seems like a great way for counselors to meet student needs “behind
the scenes.” I have heard of this type of program in
the past, and have often wondered how such a program could benefit my
school. I feel that having this
type of a mentor would be exceptionally beneficial to all students. We currently have character ed once per
month, which really does nothing to improve the climate of the school. I always thought that, in order for
such an intervention to work, it would need to occur much more frequently so
that the teachers can actually get to know the students. In order for such a program to work,
counselors would need to get teachers on board, and to train them in how to run
TAP meetings with students. This
type of group intervention would be very different than most teachers would be
used to, so they would need lots of support to make it successful.
The
“Reflection Moment” on page 94 (Dollarhide & Saginak, 2012) encourages
readers to reflect on whether or not teachers and school counselors should
co-deliver classroom guidance. I
believe that there are benefits to co-delivering curriculum. First, the counselor is the expert in
how to meet personal/social needs of students, and how to conduct discussions
pertaining to this domain. Teachers
may need this type of support to deliver the information. Secondly, co-teaching is a great way
for counselors to get to know the students in the school, and to basically “advertise”
themselves as a service to students.
It seems to be a common trend that students do not know whom their
counselors are, let alone what they can do for them. On the other hand, perhaps this type of co-teaching support
could be faded eventually as the teacher becomes more comfortable in order to
free up time so that the counselor can implement other components of his/her
delivery system.
The
last section of chapter six focuses on a social justice approach to
comprehensive school counseling. It
is timely that I read this when I did. On Saturday night I was hanging out with some ladies who have
school-aged children. All but 2 of
them are Hispanic. One of the
Hispanic women started talking about her 5-year-old son coming home from school
and telling her that he was going to participate in a counseling group called
“Banana splits.” It’s a group to
support children whose parents have broken up or divorced. The mother was very passionately
against this, saying, “he has never known his dad and I to be together because
we split before he was born.” She
was also making fun of the name, saying that he may develop a complex thinking
he is a banana. She then further
related it to a gorilla. At one
point she made the comment, “I’m so tired of these white schools.” I just thought, “Wow, how could this
have been handled differently to get this mother on board?” Simply making a phone call home could
make all the difference. I would
think that a logical first step would be for the counselor to determine how the
parent believes that the child is affected by his parents’ break up. I’m wondering, is it best practice to
get a signature before placing a student in a group? This is a change of educational placement, so students with
IEP’s should definitely have a parent signature to ensure legal consent. Something we will inevitably need
to contend with is the fact that parents will not want their child in a
group. In this case, if we know
that an intervention is essential, is it unethical to have the child in a group
if he/she would like to join?
This is where our collaboration techniques will need to kick into
gear. I think that personality is
a key factor in a person’s ability to build relationships. Unless a parent has a relationship with
you, they may not consider anything you have to say. I wonder, what are some other ways that counselors have “chipped
away at the mortar in the wall that divides schools from the very communities
they are attempting to serve?” (Dollarhide & Saginak, 2012, p. 105).
Reference:
Dollarhide,
C. T., & Saginak, K. A. (2012). Comprehensive school counseling programs.
(2nd
ed.). New York: Pearson, Inc
No comments:
Post a Comment