I
am not going to lie about my feeling on the opening vignette. When I first read
it my immediate thoughts were along the lines of wondering what the hell had I
just read. However, after I read the accompanying questions for the vignette
things became a little clearer and I admittedly was offended. Was the text
insinuating that I was supposed to assume that the yelling mother was a
minority? That she was impoverished? That she possessed some sort of mental
health issue? Because those aspects never crossed my mind. My immediate
thoughts were that this was a middle class European-American mother that was of
fine mental health but she had a strong disdain for the school feeling that it
did not offer the best opportunity for her son. Only afterwards did those
thoughts cross my mind. That is not to say that I don’t acknowledge the
existence of factors such as cultural ways of communication (high versus low
context) or socioeconomic status that could have come into play. However, I
also feel as if those factors only should come into play when there is a clear
and positive assurance that these factors may be coming into play. However, the
vignette did an excellent job setting up the ever-changing dynamics and
constructs we, as counselors, have to worry about, that I don’t feel other
educational professionals are even aware of or take concern of.
One
thing I think that the chapter and article did exceptionally well was to
highlight and frame the need for counselors to best address the needs of students.
Moreover, addressing the needs of the student’s family and/or community and not
just the needs of the student. I think that is best highlighted in that quote
from the article: “[The school’s principal] believed that the counselors often
had a "bigger picture of the needs of the school than other staff
members." I think this is always true. While our future coworkers are
educated in pedagogical techniques (Teachers) or motivating other faculty
members to produce best results (Principals) we’re taught to look beyond the
numbers. Sure, there are some teachers that attempt to do this but they find
themselves hamstringed by local, state, and national policies often times.
However, we’re taught to almost instantaneously look beyond what is deemed best
for the school and focus solely on the students’. Our accountability/success is
directly tied into that whereas teachers can be excellent teachers but if they
get a kinesthetic learner but have to teach traditionally, it’ll reflect badly
on their measure of accountability; standardized testing. The same basic
principal falls on the principal and accountability as well. I think that this
is why these emerging facets are thrust upon counselors first because they deal
with what we’re inherently supposed to address in the first place. That is also
why I think it’s our job to educate our eventual coworkers on these matters.
That was even highlighted in the article where “another principal noted that as
a result of her counselor's influence and leadership, she and her staff had
changed how they thought about students' academic problems and the role
students could have in assessing their own performance.” I’d wager that
constructs such as poverty, multicultural factors, and the like immediately
came into mind for other faculty but certainly did for the counselor(s).
All
in all I think this chapter and article reinforced just how important the need
for counselors is. We’re not just helping one student at a time through
individual counseling sessions. Rather we’re systemic change agents because
we’re ethically trained to be by understanding various dynamics, that aren’t so
easily discernable, that come into play and effect children. And as the chapter
made evident, there are new concerns always on the horizon and who will be the
first individuals taking the brunt of education on these concerns? Counselors. Hell,
I think that Mrs. Ostrowski, Mr. Sharpe, and Mr. Milton hammered these points
home in the conversation tonight.
Dollarhide, C.T., & Saginak,
K.A. (2012). Comprehensive school counseling programs (2nd
Ed.). New York:
Pearson, Inc.
Amatea, E. & Clark, M. (2005). Changing schools, changing counselors: A qualitative study
of
school administrators' conceptions of the school counselor role. Professional School
Counseling 9(1), 16.
No comments:
Post a Comment