Monday, November 11, 2013

Week 10 Blog


This week’s reading provided some good reminders about good teaching.  I strive to incorporate all of these positive teaching techniques and ways of interacting with students into my daily routine, but the reality is that I’m human and sometimes let my own frustrations get the best of me.  Reminders like this are often needed.  I really connected with the Love and Logic system of teaching.  In fact, I like it so much that I ordered the book. J  This philosophy is a very positive, solution-focused way of managing a classroom.  It emphasizes Choice Theory, which I love and use often, and appreciate learning new ways of incorporating it.  While reading through this section of the book, I went through some of the dialogue with my students.  While many do respond well to this type of interaction, I could see others making a mockery of it (pardon me while I play Devil’s Advocate).  For example, when asking a student, “What do you think might happen if you keep talking instead of working?”  I could totally see a student saying, “I think I’d have fun!”  If responding, “that’s a possibility.  What else?”  I could see the student making comments such as, “everyone else would have fun!” or “Nothing else.  I just want to have fun!”  I do understand that I could continue to encourage the conversation in a more productive direction; however, then this puts attention on the student and most likely others would be joining in and laughing, thereby reinforcing an undesirable behavior.  Therefore, the use of these techniques needs to be done with great “withitness.” 

            Of course, my experiences are primarily based with middle school students.  Because of this, I was amused to read the article, The Unique Nature of Middle School Counseling (Akos, 2005).  Unique is only the beginning; counseling middle schoolers, I imagine, would be worlds different than counseling elementary or high school students.  I strongly agree with the sentiment that it is important to staff schools “with teachers who are experts at teaching early adolescents” (Akos, 2005).  I do believe that most middle school teachers are in middle school for a reason: they “get” these students.  Sometimes, however, there are teachers who do not consider developmental issues surrounding adolescents in middle school.  I would imagine that this would create quite a barrier for middle school counselors in educating teachers in how to implement the “developmental curriculum” (Dollarhide & Saginak, 2012).  I believe that middle school is the optimal place in which to teach the developmental curriculum along with the academic curriculum.  I believe that it is the task of a school counselor to encourage and support this with teachers, and I wonder how some do so.  I understand the concept of meeting with a teacher advisory “cadre,” and I wonder how practical and effective this is.  I do believe that there are teachers who are extremely passionate about this and would be willing to take their time to be part of such a group.  Perhaps these teachers could then share in the undertaking of encouraging others to take their lead in putting developmental issues at the forefront.

            Not only do counselors need to educate teachers, but they must also educate parents.  Akos (2005) stated, “Even parent engagement, while desirable at all levels of schooling, is more salient in middle school due to the typical drop-off in parent involvement.”  I agree 110%.  The problem is that many parents of students at this age have the belief that the students are getting older and need to learn to be more independent; therefore they are backing off in their involvement.  The reality is, students need support and modeling in how to be more mature and independent young citizens.  Not only should they be getting this from their teachers, but they should also get a more individualized approach at this responsibility and maturity, which most effectively comes from parents.  Parents are a great source of support for middle school students, and if they back off too quickly, this may allow greater influence to occur through – guess who – peers (not always the best examples of role models at this age).  Truly, middle school counselors (and teachers) are a special breed. J


References:
Akos, P. (2005, December).  The unique nature of middle school counseling.  Professional School             Counseling, 9(2), 95-103.

Dollarhide, C.T., & Saginak, K.A. (2012). Comprehensive school counseling programs
            (2nd Ed.). New York: Pearson, Inc. 

No comments:

Post a Comment