I really
liked the Chapter in the text and I also liked the accompanying article. What I
truly enjoyed was the fact that the two seemed to be connected in the
information that they presented. What I mean by this is that the article seemed
as if it was used to help create the chapter within the Dollarhide &
Saginak (2012) text. I say this because the required readings both contained
similar citations and the article even contained a citation to a previous
Dollarhide article on counseling. All in all they both worked together to help
change the perceptions that I had on what exactly it means to be in a
leadership position as a counselor.
My
preconception of what it means to be a leader as a school counselor existed
prior to joining this program. Heck, even still, without sounding too
introspective I think that my perception remained that way up until reading
this chapter and article. My belief on what it meant to be a leader as a
counselor was that I was to inherently lead children as I would be an authoritative
figure in the school setting. Thus I would set a good example for them, show
them what it meant to be an outstanding member of the school/community, and to
a lesser extent help them with their problems. With that last aspect I’ve
always seen it as the primary role of the job, in my opinion, but I didn’t see
it as “leading” per se. Ideally I thought I would achieve all of this simply
through just counseling them and implementing a guidance program that promote
personal/social, academic and career development. After reading the chapter I
see how that does indeed come into play but I also see that I was overlooking
some aspects. Essentially I was focusing on the pre-conceived notion of what it
means to be a counselor and how that is being a leader. However, I was ignoring
what we have learned all semester about additional counselor roles because
these roles play a part in counselor leadership too
The book was
basically able to simplify the fact that everything that we do is in some way,
shape, or form leadership. Moreover, that all those roles and how they come
into play in leadership can be classified into three aspects; Advocating,
Consultation, and Coordination. All of these with the present and future
orientation of achieving positive goals.
When we advocate
we serve as leaders because we are helping and bettering the individuals for
whom we are advocating. Persons that we
will advocate for will primarily be at the individual level via students but as
counselors we can also advocate for the family, school or local community
systems in an effort to improve the present and future outlooks of our
students. This touches on/equates to my idea of “helping students with their
problems.” Even more so if they’re unaware of them. An excellent example of
this in the text was multicultural competence/advocacy.
When we consult we are immediately placed into the
expert role in hopes that our expertise can help solve the issue at hand. This
alone makes us a leader. We are brought in pre-emptively and reactively in
hopes to solve a problem that it is believed that teachers cannot handle on
their own. Additionally, the fact that the role of consultation is to help in
advocating for the client also makes us a leader.
Finally, when we coordinate our comprehensive guidance
programs this serves in a leadership role. With accountability backing our
guidance program we can continue to be the “expert” in this situation
inherently placing us into a leadership role. Additionally, in installing such
a program we aim to implement change to show our students how to be outstanding
members of a cohort and eventually society. This touches on/equates to my idea
of modeling for them and teaching them what it means to be an outstanding
member of the school and community.
So while my initial thoughts on being a leader as a
counselor were “correct” to an extent they were very basic in nature and missed
a wide array of/oversimplified the leadership roles.
I would like
to close this Blog with an interesting note. I found it intriguing how the
“Leadership” chapter could very much apply to the conversations we had last
week. Perhaps this is because they dealt with advocacy and consultation. With
the Chapter 10 vignette we talked about advocating for students who did not
feel like the “young” teachers were doing an adequate job. This certainly
places you in a leader role in two ways; a leader for the students and a leader
amongst your coworkers in bringing about systematic change to fix this
situation. I think that example perfectly demonstrated leadership through
advocating and consultation. I also believe the conversation sparked by Nakia,
Ami and myself last week also is very much related to this week’s topic. We, as
a class, got into talking about waiting to implement your comprehensive program
after a year in the school to not ruffle feathers and most (if not all) of the
class agreed. The Mason (2010) article seemed very much to corroborate this as
it showed younger/newer counselors, even with ASCA training tend to doubt
themselves as leaders but their coworkers might feel this way too. However,
unlike the article I believe that this shows leadership in and of itself by
displaying some leadership qualities listed on Page 191 in the text; diplomacy/tact,
cooperation, tolerance for stress, and broadmindedness.
All in all I thought this was an excellent chapter and
I very much looked forward to writing this blog.
Dollarhide, C.T., & Saginak, K.A. (2012). Comprehensive
school counseling programs (2nd
Ed.). New York:
Pearson, Inc.
Mason, E. (2010). Leadership
practices of school counselors and counseling program
implementation. NAASP Bulletin, 94
(4), 274-285. DOI: 10.1177/0192636510395012
No comments:
Post a Comment